Letter: Kind killing: a dangerous mistake
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Angela Lambert's compassionate views are common to all who campaign for legalised euthanasia ('Killing them with kindness', 8 September). Unfortunately, they are, at best, ingenuous. At worst, they are profoundly and dangerously mistaken. They fail to differentiate voluntary euthanasia from assisted suicide and from the continuation of inappropriate treatment.
Admittedly, the last does occur quite frequently, and appears to have done so in some of the cases Angela Lambert describes. However, if the medical profession does err at times in this direction, it is surely preferable to the alternative. Hopefully, no one is suggesting involuntary euthanasia which is, of course, better described as murder.
In my experience, voluntary euthanasia is very rare. Indeed, despite many years of treating elderly people suffering from all manner of dreadful diseases, I cannot recall a specific request. This is also the general experience of my colleagues working in hospices. Perhaps this is because we mainly encounter patients who are given adequate and proper care.
Most dangerous of all is the notion that the elderly are more burdensome when they develop incurable disease. This is ageism at its worst. If anything, old people should receive a greater dividend from society since they have usually made a greater investment.
Yours faithfully,
D. L. CROSBY
Consultant Surgeon
University Hospital of Wales
Cardiff
12 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments