Letter: Kenneth Clarke's Budget: taxes, consumer spending, unemployment and Canada's Tories

Mr Bill Morris
Thursday 02 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I am glad that your somewhat favourable leader comments on the Chancellor's magical Budget tricks contained the important caveat that judgement must at least be reserved on the tax increases that keep showing from the conjurer's sleeve. For tax is the centre of the strategy employed by Kenneth Clarke and his colleagues.

This has been no ordinary Budget to balance revenue and expenditure. It underlines the Government's fundamental shift to indirect taxation aimed at allowing wealthier Tory supporters to enjoy a disproportionate share of the national cake. The message is: if the wealthy don't need it, let's scrap it. If they do need particular services, let's find a way of ensuring they pay less than they can afford while others pay proportionately more of their income.

With three new taxes - insurance, airport tax and a threatened tax on motorway travel - combined with increased indirect taxation on petrol and cars, it is clear that living costs will rise in consequence. That means the poor will pay more, and for reduced services.

This strategy represents a clear attack on the interests of ordinary working people. Until it becomes possible to change that strategy, trade unions will pursue our members' interests by seeking wage increases that take account of the damage the Budget will do to standards of living.

Yours faithfully,

BILL MORRIS

General Secretary, Transport

and General Workers Union

London, SW1

1 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in