Letter: Kenneth Clarke's Budget: taxes, consumer spending, unemployment and Canada's Tories

Dr E. G. Nisbet
Thursday 02 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Kenneth Clarke's abolition of marriage allowance was one of the biggest changes in the Budget - pounds 830m, rising soon to a billion. The lack of response is an index in the shift of interest that has occurred over the past decade in the British centre, both at Westminster and in the media.

We have recently moved back from western Canada, where similar things occurred through the 1980s. Eventually, the lions roared and ate the tamer. It started with the Canadian Tory destruction of the West's railways; a decade of assault on settled values followed, with changes to Sunday shopping, VAT changes, a tax system that was superficially individual but in reality hit married couples harder than cohabiting singles. All the familiar British ingredients, introduced by a government that was seen as being wholly for big business.

The response was the explosive growth of the Reform Party. The UK media have portrayed this as a party of the redneck right, but that is unfair. It has those followers, but as a Liberal I found its basic Gladstonian radical stance difficult to counter. It stood for family values, financial prudence, and a caring but not extravagant society. The rednecks are strictly followers, not leaders.

Unless the UK Liberals listen carefully to the likes of David Alton, they will find a similar new rival party develops here. For the Tories, Mr Clarke's abolition of the marriage allowance may have even more interesting consequences. Given that Westminster has rather more seats than Ottawa, I should guess four seats for the anti-family Tories at the next election.

Yours sincerely,

E. G. NISBET

Englefield Green, Surrey

1 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in