Letter: Kant and God as the regulative Ideal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I have a bone to pick with my friend John Hick (letter, 9 August), who again associates me with Feuerbach and claims that something called 'critical realism' is possible.
That is not how I see the matter. I argue that the book which first began the present controversies, my Taking Leave of God (1980), was expressly Kantian in argument and vocabulary. It was Kant whose critical philosophy ended the old kind of metaphysical realism, and Kant who first argued that God should be regarded as a regulative Ideal.
I maintain that 'critical realism' is an oxymoron, because consistently critical thinking shows that we are always inside our own vocabularies and our own angle on the world. We should give up the idea that we can somehow jump right out of our own limitations and achieve absolute knowledge, while yet remaining ourselves.
Yours sincerely,
DON CUPITT
Emmanuel College
Cambridge
9 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments