LETTER: Jury avoidance
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Anthony Scrivener, QC
Sir: The problem for the Serious Fraud Office in the Maxwell case was that the jury did understand the evidence and the fact that a jury returns a correct verdict is hardly a reason for doing away with juries. The only sure way of getting convictions is to let the SFO decide the result.
Yours faithfully,
Anthony Scrivener
2-3 Gray's Inn Square
London, WC1
22 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments