LETTER: Judging a balance of right and wrong

John Henderson
Tuesday 12 September 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas

Editor

From Mr John Henderson

Sir: John C. Welch clearly had an unhappy experience of being a lay magistrate. I can recognise from my own, rather more limited, experience on the bench his concerns about the attitude of his colleagues, who use their appointments for making social contacts. However, such attitudes are far from typical and are becoming increasingly rare. Recent directions from the Lord Chancellor on the chairmanship of benches and of courts have brought about changes and improvement. Training is improving.

Both school governors and health authority members under some circumstances are required to act in a quasi-judicial manner.

Does Mr Welch really want a system where the verdict in a trial is the judgement of one individual? Appeals to the Crown Court are heard by a judge sitting with two magistrates.

Yours faithfully,

John Henderson

Alton, Hampshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in