Letter: Judges ignored the peaceful protestors
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your editorial "Long hot summer on the docks" (13 April) clearly emphasises the judgmental rather than judicially impartial tone of yesterday's High Court judgment on the live animal exports issue. The judges have gone beyond the boundaries of stating what the law allows into censure and implied threat.
They do no justice to peaceful, law-abiding animal welfare demonstrators by dismissing them in conveniently derogatory terms as animal rights activists bent on mob rule.
The judgment moves on from stating what the live animal exporters can do, to pressing what the port and airport authorities must do, and what the demonstrators had better do - or else.
Nowhere is there spelt out what protesters against a cruel and immoral trade can do to show their objections. Nowhere is the role of lawful dissent in a democratic society even acknowledged.
Yours sincerely,
TERESA RICKARDS
Bury, Lancashire
13 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments