Letter: John Patten's bad example
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Professor Timothy Brighouse, who was so unexpectedly denounced by John Patten as a 'nutter' yesterday, is my former pupil ('Patten calls schools chief a nutter', 7 October). He was an able, intelligent and level-headed young man. His public career, which I have followed at a distance, has been such as to tempt a former tutor to claim more responsibility than perhaps he should.
Mr Patten's attempt to dismiss mainstream thinking with which he does not agree in this fashion is a threat to more than the reputation of an individual. It is part of the insidious and unconscious trend towards the thinking of a one-party state which happens when a government has been in office too long. It is exactly the sort of thing we must resist the temptation to do to the Conservatives when they eventually go out of office. Mr Patten's example will not make this task any easier for us.
Yours sincerely,
RUSSELL
House of Lords
London, SW1
7 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments