Letter: Jamaica's colonial law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article 'An ancient court proves its worth' (3 November) is an enthusiastic endorsement of the Privy Council decision that Jamaica cannot execute those found guilty and liable to execution under Jamaican law. A predictable liberal reaction, but surely a classic liberal dilemma.
The Privy Council's authority rests on colonial history; it is an anachronistic, colonial institution. Do you only condemn cultural imperialism by reference to outcomes, or is self-determination an absolute right? Whatever the answer, perhaps one ought to see this problem from a Jamaican perspective, not forgetting British reaction to rule from Maastricht, and certainly be careful not to dismiss Jamaicans as primitives who still need their colonial ex-masters to teach them how to behave.
Yours etc,
H. A. GLOVER
Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments