Letter: Jail, fines and injustice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Mary Honeyball
Sir: Prison has long been a rather uncomfortable expediency for dealing with those who will not or cannot pay their fines. After the Home Secretary's welcome announcement that fine defaulters should no longer be imprisoned, we should now be alert to the danger of another, though slightly less uncomfortable, expediency filling the void ("Howard to end jail for fines debtors", 14 February).
Our first duty must be to see that the fine imposed is viable, something which the too hastily abandoned "unit" fines did. Then we should review the enforcement procedures which make sure offenders do not forget that discharging their fine is not an option they can afford to neglect. Too often these intermediate stages seem to be leapfrogged. Only when these two parts of the system are functioning properly should we look at the possibility of altering, and upping, the original sentencer's decision into the bracket covered by another sentence.
When an uncollected fine is turned into a prison sentence, or possibly in the future a community sentence, the court is spending money rather than collecting it. In these cases inefficiency and injustice are too easily combined.
Yours faithfully,
Mary Honeyball
General Secretary
Association of Chief Officers
of Probation
London, E1
15 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments