Letter: It was a war worth fighting

Judith Farbey
Saturday 26 June 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BOB MARSHALL-ANDREWS correctly highlights the Government's distortion of language in its "vainglorious prose" about "a war for the future of civilisation and democracy". Tony Blair promoted the Nato action in ways that chip away at our own democratic ideals. He justified air strikes solely by reference to end result: Nato action would lead to civilisation, democracy and human rights; Nato inaction would lead to a victory for evil. Ministers failed to answer those who correctly said the bombing had no basis in international law. The assumption that ends justify means is more the hallmark of authoritarian than liberal regimes. Mr Blair maintained that all sensible, reasonable people must support the war. He refused to tolerate any real debate, as exemplified by his attack on Alex Salmond for speaking out. His reduction of his own political end game to a self- evident truth reveals an authoritarian streak.

The Government tried to monumentalise Slobodan Milosevic's evil by using images from the Second World War. Who could sensibly fail to oppose military action against this modern-day Hitler whose ethnic cleansing is a modern- day "final solution"? This reasoning obscured important differences between the Nazis and the Serbs. It denigrates the role of vigorous political analysis. It leads, in effect, to the "dumbing down" of political debate.

The Kosovar tragedy is indeed the product of an evil Yugoslavian regime. Tony Blair's bellicose and sanctimonious response is nevertheless deeply worrying.

JUDITH FARBEY

London NW5

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in