LETTER : It may be ugly, but it's part of our heritage
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr David Morton
Sir: Peter Popham ("Brutalist, original, but a slum", 2 October) raises the contentious issue of listing buildings less than 30 years after they were constructed.
There is as yet no unanimity of view about modern architecture and townscape. The Royal Town Planning Institute carried out internal consultation on the 40 modern buildings that the Secretary of State for National Heritage has proposed for listing. There was general agreement that some should or should not be listed, but on the majority there were widely differing views. There is clearly a need for a debate, involving the public as well as the various specialists, about which elements of modern architecture and planning should be preserved, and it will obviously take time for a consensus to develop.
It may seem difficult to believe now that in, say, 30 years, there will be general support for modern architecture, or for some of its schemes, as examples of the development of town planning; but the same could have been said about Victorian townscape 25 years ago. It took 60 to 90 years before Victorian buildings became obsolete. Because of the increasing speed of economic change, modern buildings reach that stage within 30 years, and are then often demolished or substantially refurbished.
We must face up to the difficult decisions of listing a good and representative sample of post-war buildings now. No doubt, our successors will think that some of the choices made were mistakes, but that is preferable to there being a visual gap in the architectural and planning townscape development of the country in 30 or 40 years.
Yours faithfully,
David Morton
Convenor, Conservation Panel
Royal Town Planning Institute
London W1
3 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments