Letter: Is the hunt antique pageantry or sentimental sadism?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I NEVER thought I would actually see a properly independent (I mean an intellectually, or dare I say philosophically, unbiased) article about hunting in the Independent on Sunday. Let alone one by Roger Scruton.
I subscribe to your paper and I have often regretted it. Your stance on hunting has, for a long time, been thoroughly biased, often offensively so to someone who cares about animals and who has a good conscience about how death should happen in the field. There has, of course, been the odd article by the likes of Jilly Cooper and Duff Hart-Davis that showed the other side, that is the country side, or an appreciation of the possibility of a different view point.
I love this country and have chosen to live in it, one of the main reasons being hunting. Roger Scruton expresses my feelings extremely well. I actually feel privileged to be able to partake of this sport in this still wonderful country, to be allowed to ride over people's land (something I do not take for granted) and to see the countryside from the back of a wonderful and generous creature who does actually partake of the pleasure and excitement of the sport.
Should hunting go, the look and feel of this country will change irremediably. Hedges and spinneys, kept as breeding ground for wild animals, will go, and the appearance of the land will be at least as distressed as it was by the disappearance of the elm. This is not just a romantic view, it is an ecological one, as well. People whose only concern is for the "welfare" of foxes and deer do not see the paradox hunting people live: that the welfare of his quarry is the hunter's prime concern, and that sport properly conducted is geared to ensuring the welfare of the quarry species. Without sentimentality.
I would like to quote a text that I believe is the creed of sincere sportsmen. "Sport may be defined as the fair, difficult, exciting, perhaps dangerous, pursuit of any animal, who has the odds in his favour, whose courage, strength, speed or cunning are more or less a match for or superior to our own, whose natural instinct engages a considerable amount of our intelligence to overcome it, and whose death, being of service, is justifiable" (Badminton Library - Moor and Marsh, 1887).
FRANCISCO CARDONA
Doulting Beacon, Somerset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments