Letter: Irish votes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DAVID WALTON (Letters, 15 August) questions the legitimacy of the Act of Union of 1801 (which united Ireland and Britain under a Westminster government) on the basis that the Irish parliament contained an unrepresentative number of Protestants. I need hardly remind him that, at the time, the right to vote in both Ireland and Britain was the preserve of the wealthy, who tended to elect their own kind and thus maintained governments with a rather narrow viewpoint. This is hardly democracy as we know it today but was accepted as such at the time. If this makes the Act of Union suspect, then all legislation passed prior to universal suffrage is equally illegitimate.
MICHAEL WATTS
Newtownards, Co Down
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments