Letter: Irish famine and 'ethnic cleansing'

Dr Peter Gray
Sunday 11 September 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Beatrix Campbell spoils her interesting article on the continuing relevance of the great Irish famine ('It's time to open our eyes and think of Ireland', 6 September) with a number of inaccuracies. Contemporary observers spoke of some 20 (named) people dying on the infamous Doolough 'famine march' in 1849, but exhaustion and hunger may well have increased the eventual total of fatalities to the several hundreds mentioned in local folklore. However, the claim that 5,000 were swept into the lough appears to be a fanciful embellishment. This question of numbers is significant.

The Irish famine is one of the best-documented episodes in Irish history, and much can be reconstructed with a fair degree of accuracy through careful research. It is precisely the repetition of eye-catching but unsubstantiated claims that has allowed much of English opinion to dismiss the horror of the famine as so much Irish exaggeration with the consequences that Campbell so rightly deprecates.

It is both wrong and distracting to describe the famine as an episode of English 'ethnic cleansing'. The dominant strand in British policy could more accurately be summarised as the forced Anglicisation of Irish society at whatever human cost, a policy that has closer parallels to the strategies of the World Bank and IMF in developing countries today than it has to events in former Yugoslavia, and hence more relevant to the internationalist concerns of the organisers of the annual Doolough commemoration and the famine museum at Strokestown.

Yours faithfully,

PETER GRAY

Downing College

Cambridge

6 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in