Letter: 'Invisible' works of art at the Tate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: David Lister's article ('Tate Gallery may split collections', 25 August) made the still common error of suggesting that the Tate collection is invisible if it cannot be seen on Millbank. He believes that 'Stanley Spencer . . . does not now have a single picture on display'. On the contrary, the most complete and coherent display of Spencer's work in the collection ever assembled is currently on exhibition at the Tate (in Liverpool).
Mr Lister reports a concern over the 'division' of the Tate's British and international collections. The Tate already has a building devoted to 20th-century art, where British art is clearly understood to be embraced within the scope of the international
collections.
Tate Gallery Liverpool attracts the same number of visitors annually as the Victoria and Albert Museum or the Musee d'Art Moderne at the Centre Pompidou in Paris, and accounts for one-third of all visitors to the Tate collections.
The Trustees of the Tate decided a decade ago that the nation's pictures should be more readily accessible to people who live in the regions, but there are still critics who argue about the rehanging of the collection while studiously ignoring the impact of Tate Gallery Liverpool and other regional initiatives.
Yours sincerely,
LEWIS BIGGS
Curator
PAULA RIDLEY
Trustee
Tate Gallery Liverpool
Liverpool
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments