LETTER : Investors pay for personal pensions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr James Roberts
Sir: Your report (19 April) gives details of the large amount of money which might be paid to those wrongly advised to arrange personal pensions. You omitted to mention where the money might come from.
The financial services industry is large and complicated. It includes product providers, internal and external sales organisations and regulators, however looking at the industry as a whole, there are only two sources of revenue feeding three areas of expenditure.
Money going into the financial services industry comes from the investing public and the net return on investments. Of this, approximately 85 per cent is paid as benefits to investors, 10 per cent pays salaries, bonuses and dividends to shareholders and 5 per cent covers overheads such as rent and paper.
Any compensation has to come from this pot of money. There is little scope for taking it from the salaries portion - much of this is the cost of regulation which has snowballed as a result of the personal pension review. The only way the industry can pay compensation is by reducing the benefits paid to other investors. The main losers are likely to be those who have held with profits policies for a long period of time.
Yours faithfully,
JAMES ROBERTS
Beckenham, Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments