Letter: Investigation of deaths in custody

Deborah Coles Helen Shaw
Thursday 03 April 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: At a time when the two main political parties vie with each other over dealing with young offenders it was with sadness and anger that we learnt about the death of the 15-year-old who was found unconscious in Hartlepool police station on 1 April (report, 3 April).

This death raises profound questions about the care afforded juveniles in police stations and about the adequacy of current guidelines within the Police and Criminal Evidence Act Codes of Practice and of their implementation. It is Inquest's experience in over 16 years of monitoring deaths in police custody and working with bereaved families that guidelines are frequently insufficiently adhered to and even where they are, do not provide a proper framework in which the police should exercise the duty of care they owe to those in their custody.

We have no confidence in a mechanism of investigation which allows the Cleveland police to investigate a death in Cleveland police custody. These investigations are secret and open to accusations of bias. The content is never made public or available to the bereaved family and yet it forms the basis on which the Police Complaints Authority decide whether disciplinary charges are to be brought and whether procedural changes should be recommended and it strongly influences the shape of the inquest. The inquest is the only public forum for examining such deaths with its many procedural problems - notably the lack of legal aid for representation for the bereaved, the lack of prior disclosure of any documentation and its narrow remit.

A new government must act to ensure that bereaved families are given access to all the information about their loved one's death before the inquest and institute a public inquiry into the whole investigative and legal process which follows deaths in custody to ensure that families can discover the truth about how their loved one died and the police are fully accountable to the public they supposedly serve.

DEBORAH COLES

HELEN SHAW

Co-Directors

Inquest

London N4

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in