Letter: International law on juvenile crime
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Recent government and opposition statements on juvenile offenders ('Juveniles to be locked up', 3 March) appear to have ignored the United Kingdom's international legal obligations.
An underlying principle of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child together with other recent international instruments relating to juvenile justice, stress the importance of reintegration and the fulfilling of a constructive role in society. Segregation in secure units can only contribute to the child's sense of isolation and stigmatisation.
The Home Secretary's proposals regarding education and training should be offered after the commission of the first offence as a preventative measure and then should continue. International standards seek to educate children within the community and not segregate them from it.
In any event, in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, children should be deprived of their liberty only as a matter of last resort. This implies that recent statutory changes aimed at avoiding institutionalisation should be given a proper opportunity to take effect.
May we suggest that before embarking on a reversal of existing national policies, political parties advocating change should take cognisance of the legal responsibilities the UK has assumed.
Yours faithfully,
GERALDINE VAN BUEREN Director (UK), CATHERINE MUYEKA MUMMA (Kenya), CERI W. PEMBERTON (UK), ANNE-MARIE TOOTELL (UK), KATINKA TATTERSALL (The Netherlands), JUDY LOWN (Israel)
Programme on International Rights of the Child
Faculty of Law
Queen Mary and Westfield College
University of London
London, E1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments