Letter: Insights from the social sciences are needed to protect the environment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In his article about environmental threats ('Forgive us our eco-trespasses', 2 February), Bryan Appleyard quite rightly looks behind the uncertainties surrounding global warming and other global changes to the underlying sense of frustration that many people feel in the face of these uncertainties.
Environmentalism, in its various different forms, is a response to human needs and our apparent powerlessness. This is why environmental change must be a global concern of the social sciences, whose insights and understanding are needed before we can frame relevant and effective policies.
The centrality of human behaviour and purposes in the face of uncertainties over the global environment prompted the Economic and Social Research Council to initiate an ambitious research programme, costing in excess of pounds 20m. This is much the biggest research programme of its kind in Europe. We are still well ahead of many of our European partners in focusing on both the causes and effects of global changes.
Mr Appleyard might have added that many, if not most, of the measures we need to take to avert global environmental changes are beneficial in the short and medium term (anti-pollution measures and cleaner technologies are examples). In dealing with uncertainty, the precautionary principle is important, together with a citizenry aware that we can act decisively to prevent environmental catastrophes.
The only way of tackling the anxieties that environmentalism reflects is to be more aware of the dangers of doing nothing and the utility of taking preventive action. Bryan Appleyard's short piece has helped place the real agenda before the public. This has to be warmly welcomed.
Yours sincerely,
MICHAEL REDCLIFT
Wye College
University of London
Wye,
Kent
2 February
The writer is Research Co-ordinator, Global Environmental Change, Economic and Social Research Council.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments