Letter: Information technology failures in modern business
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your coverage of failures in computer projects glimpses the tip of an iceberg. Much survey material published during the past three years suggests that the rate of failure in implementing information technology in the private sector may be as high as 80 per cent, if the criterion for success is meeting the objectives established at the outset of the project. As many as one in 10 projects are thought to fail in implementation.
Many organisations automate processes without questioning the validity of these processes. Systems are built according to an organisational model that was pre-computer and pre-telecommunications, that generally is hierarchical and operates in departmental compartments. This structure fails to support modern business, which has had to address task integration, the compression of business processes and the concurrent performance of tasks, in order to function competitively in the modern world.
We talk of information technology. The word information is key. Any software solution that concentrates on functionality (as most are) is necessarily biased towards the transient needs of the organisation at the time it is purchased. What this means for the purchaser is costly operational work-arounds to support the deficiencies of the system. Folly at the time of the decision is measured as expense after the fact. Until we recognise that change is an inevitable component of doing business, we will continue to have rotten information technology.
Yours sincerely,
GEOFFREY WILKINS
Chief Executive
Solaris Information Systems
London, SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments