LETTER : Information about child abusers in the social services
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Keith Mathieson
Sir: It would be good if both Islington and the Department of Health ministers would tell us the basis of the legal advice which has apparently persuaded them not to circulate actively the identities of suspected child abusers.
It is a defence to a libel action to show that the communication in question was made on an occasion of qualified privilege. Privileged communications include those made under a legal or moral imperative.
Can there be a greater moral imperative on those who know of suspected child abusers than to share their suspicions with anyone who might be thinking of employing such individuals to work with children?
Yours faithfully,
Keith Mathieson
Oswald Hickson Collier
(Solicitors)
London, EC4
3 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments