Letter: Indians were not killed by Nazis
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.AS A SPECIALIST in American history I was disappointed with John P Fox's review of James Wilson's The Earth Shall Weep: A History of Native America ("Red or dead?", Review, 26 July). He reduces a complex story of cultural conflict and interaction which lasted more than five centuries to a "single word and phrase: land and its possession". Such an approach flies in the face of much of the scholarship on this subject.
The overwhelming majority of American Indians who died as a result of contact with Europeans and European-Americans died from disease, not in battle or from massacres at the hands of whites. Massacres indeed occurred. The number killed in them is in the tens of thousands. The number who died from disease is in the millions.
Dr Fox assumes the displacement of American Indians was the result of a concerted programme like that of the Nazis. Such a view is difficult to sustain when describing a process which occurred over five centuries and involved the governments of Britain, France, Spain, the United States, Mexico and Canada. Removal and extermination are not the same thing. In the main the United States pursued the former rather than the latter. And many white Americans opposed the horrific treatment of American Indians during the 19th-century.
The whole thrust of the review casts American Indians in the role of victims and white Americans as predatory aggressors. The story is much more complicated than that. Still the history of the treatment of American Indians is a shameful one. The horror and injustice is manifestly obvious. Dr Fox should let the facts speak for themselves.
Frank Cogliano
Department of History
The University of Edinburgh
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments