Letter: 'Independent' investigations

Mr Stephen Cragg,Mr John Harrison
Sunday 02 May 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The chairman of the Police Complaints Authority (PCA), Sir Leonard Peach, certainly seems in your interview with him ('Policing police performance', 29 April) to want to have his cake and eat it.

On the one hand, Sir Leonard states that he can 'see no reason' for an independent investigation of police complaints and is happy to rely on the police themselves to record and follow up complaints, interview complainants and witnesses (as chosen by them) and prepare investigation reports which are then (almost invariably) approved by the PCA. On the other hand, Sir Leonard wants to add the prefix 'independent' to the name of the authority.

A couple of years ago the authority (under a different chairmanship) did add the word 'independent' to its title on official publications. This was quickly dropped as it had no statutory basis, but it was also completely incongruous for a body that relies so heavily on the police to perform its functions.

Although the PCA may strictly be independent of the police, the police complaints system (of which the PCA is a small part) is so reliant upon the police themselves that it would be misleading for the PCA to change its name. To do so would risk giving the impression that the whole complaints structure is independent.

Yours faithfully,

STEPHEN CRAGG

JOHN HARRISON

London, E5

29 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in