Letter: In the long run extra mileage is 'green'

Mr Donald McFarlan
Sunday 29 August 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I enjoyed - as always - Hamish McRae's piece ('Uphill struggle for a 150 mpg supercar', 25 August) on making the car more environmentally friendly and agree with everything he says. However, while it obviously makes sense to seek radical solutions for future car production, the most environmentally friendly thing you can do with a car is look after it well and make it last.

Even if you run a car for 200,000 miles, as much as 60 per cent of its total energy cost will still have been taken up in its manufacture, rather than in its consumption of fuel. I run several vehicles, the oldest of which was built in 1934 and the newest in 1974. Naturally, I am irked by the current obsession with exhaust emission requirements on older vehicles.

Similarly, I have a Marks & Spencer shirt dating from 1968 which is still perfectly serviceable and frequently used. It is made of two environmentally unacceptable materials - polyester and cotton. The former is unacceptable because it is an offspring of the petrochemical industry; the latter because commercial cotton farming generally uses vast quantities of insecticides.

However, it is still better news for the environment that I continue to cherish this shirt than buy a new one from the 'green' clothing catalogue that plopped through the letterbox this morning.

Yours faithfully

DONALD McFARLAN

Merton, Oxfordshire

25 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in