Letter: In the aftermath of Croatia's re-conquest of Krajina
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: A point of balance has been reached in the long-standing rivalry between Serbs and Croats in former-Yugoslavia. Given its preference for Balkan strongmen, it is likely that the Foreign Office will be ready to allow the Croats parity with the Serbs in the region, now that they have proven themselves on the battlefield. On past experience, this will result in smaller neighbours, such as Bosnia and Macedonia, being squeezed.
Western Europe should now offer a deal to the luckless peoples of former-Yugoslavia geared towards what they have in common. Croatia and Serbia could be promised close association with the European Union and substantial economic assistance, if the following terms were acceptable:
1. Human rights and media freedom to be fully protected in both countries, with third-party states acting as guarantors;
2. Ethnically cleansed people to be allowed to return home or, if unwilling to do so, given fitting compensation;
3. Victimisation of minorities, such as the Serbs in Croat cities and the Albanians of Kosovo, to be ended;
4. Attempts to incorporate or subvert neighbouring states, including Macedonia and Bosnia, to cease;
5. The need for Belgrade and Zagreb to co-operate economically would be recognised, the volume of aid to be based on the extent of such co- operation.
The peoples of the different parts of former-Yugoslavia should be allowed, under conditions of media freedom, to vote on a co-operation programme. If it were clear that real economic advantages and a partial return to normality would flow from rejecting narrow nationalism, I am convinced that ordinary citizens would be revealed as far more pragmatic and tolerant than their leaders.
Were Slobodan Milosevic and Franjo Tudjman to reject such a package, it is likely that their authority would be weakened and liberals could at last begin to take the initiative. At the least, this offer would show the tolerant and good-hearted majority in all parts of former-Yugoslavia that Western Europe thought they were worth more than food parcels and life in a refugee camp, and that our leaders wished to include them in their vision of a new Europe.
But, at this turning point, one has to ask - where are the Western leaders with the imagination and stature to put together a Marshal Plan for the Balkans?
Yours sincerely,
Tom Gallagher
Department of Peace Studies
University of Bradford
Bradford
7 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments