Letter: In search of electoral reform
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article (20 April) on the Italian referendum says: 'MPs relied on the approval of their party bosses for their position . . . Their loyalty was to the party, not to the electorate. If they toed the line, they could be in politics for life. With all the powers of influence and patronage thus accumulated, they could build up a web of alliances with local businessmen . . .' How like our own dear system. Not, perhaps, with quite the spectacular level of corruption revealed in Italy, but a cosy club none the less.
I hope my Italian friends will make a change, but not to first-past-the-post. That will only entrench one party in power and do little or nothing to eliminate bribery and jobbery. A better option would be the single transferable vote in multi-member constituencies. That would give real power to the voters and take it from the grasp of parties.
Yours sincerely,
JOHN THOMSON
West Overton, Wiltshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments