LETTER : In defence of my aesthetic judgements
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Professor R. A. Sharpe
Sir: William Maloney (Letters, 10 February) describes his belief that Schubert is superior to Blur as "pure prejudice", but then goes on to argue that children should make and defend their own judgements about the value of art.
Steve Greenfield and Guy Osborn (same issue) argue that comparative judgements depend upon "subjective criteria" and then go on to say that children need to make informed judgements about what has value. Do your correspondents see the inconsistency here? If you think that your aesthetic judgements can be rationally defended, which of course they can, then they are not "pure prejudice".
Do Mr Greenfield and Mr Osborn really think that the truism that Tolstoy is a better writer than Lord Archer depends upon merely "subjective criteria"? Of course it does not. Reasons can be given. Taste in art is not like having a taste for ice-cream and your correspondents concede this as soon as they begin to talk about education. This surely is the point as far as Nick Tate's remarks are concerned.
Some of us are better judges of music, or painting, or literature than others because we spend a great deal of our time listening, looking or reading and thinking about these matters. To suggest that all our judgements are of equal weight does no service to schoolchildren
Yours faithfully,
R. A. Sharpe
Department of Philosophy
University of Wales
Lampeter, Dyfed
10 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments