Letter: In a lather over soap opera pay
Your support helps us to tell the story
In my reporting on women's reproductive rights, I've witnessed the critical role that independent journalism plays in protecting freedoms and informing the public.
Your support allows us to keep these vital issues in the spotlight. Without your help, we wouldn't be able to fight for truth and justice.
Every contribution ensures that we can continue to report on the stories that impact lives
Kelly Rissman
US News Reporter
From Professor Phil Redmond
Sir: Your article "'Brookside' directors in a lather over 'miserly' pay" (28 February) is a perfect example of the idiosyncratic artistic interpretation of a dramatic piece. Both your article and its source material, the letter from Piers Haggard of the Directors Guild to myself, contain cuts to the original work.
Rather than Mr Haggard having had "no reply" to his letter, he was contacted on the day his fax arrived (Friday, 23 February) and was informed that I was away but I would see it on my return. This I did the following Tuesday, with an initial reply reaching him the same date as your publication.
Most of the central characters [directors on Brookside] are staff repertory players; they therefore receive the industry staff rates. When staff are temporarily seconded to other projects, their understudies are on short - albeit expensive - freelance contracts.
One thing I have agreed in correspondence with Mr Haggard is that the "derisory pounds 75" increase could be seen as insulting. It has been withdrawn.
Yours sincerely,
Phil Redmond
Chairman
Mersey Television Company
Liverpool
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments