Letter: Imro is not silent but discreet

C. K. R. Nunneley
Sunday 21 February 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I WOULD like to make the following points about Andrew Bibby's article 'Pension watchdog 'barking in secret' ', Business, 14 February.

The Investment Management Regulatory Organisation (Imro) has pointed out publicly on a number of occasions that no one is responsible for the overall supervision of pension funds and that the combination of laws which covers the activities of pension funds is not adequate. It is because the Government has recognised the problem that Professor Goode's committee is investigating this whole area. Imro has made a submission to the committee and hopes that the committee's recommendations will pave the way for the proper regulation of pension funds.

Imro carries out many investigations into the activities of its members but it only makes the details public when wrongdoing has been proved and disciplinary action has been taken. It may cause unnecessary worry to investors if Imro publicises an investigation which then finds the member to be blameless, and it is also unfair to the member. Contrary to Mr Bibby's suggestion, I have yet to meet any members who regard this confidentiality as a handicap. Details of disciplinary action are publicised in a register which is available to the public and are also announced in press releases if Imro considers that appropriate.

C K R Nunneley

Chairman, Imro

London EC2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in