Letter: Implausible attraction

The Rev Kenneth Wilson
Wednesday 16 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In your leading article ('Elvis and Nessie: together at last?', 14 March) you ask, 'Why is the public so keen to believe the implausible?' The answer is clear. We cling to the implausible in order to avoid facing the uncomfortable fact that we live in a soullessly mathematical universe which cares not whether the human race lives or dies.

To be serviceable, all we require of our implausible beliefs is that they are shared by a reasonable number of people. We take our pick from a wide variety of choices on offer. The most widespread implausibilities are those that invoke supernatural beings or forces, and ascribe some kind of post-mortem existence to human beings.

Respectable supernatural beliefs are sometimes called religious, in order to distinguish them from the unrespectable beliefs, which are dismissed as superstitions and rank alongside crackpot notions about monsters and dead singers. Is it possible to hope for a future world in which all supernatural ideas will be recognised as superstitious, leaving us free to take proper responsibility for ourselves? Or is that, too, implausible?

Yours faithfully,

KENNETH WILSON

Wolverhampton

14 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in