Letter: Hysteria does not remove the need to prove guilt
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I CAN think of no greater sorrow than that felt at the death of a young child. The Bulger family might perhaps take some small comfort from the mass of sympathy shown for their personal loss.
However, I have never known a situation where not just angry mobs but the media have already made up their minds that the two 10-year-olds charged with the murder of James Bulger are guilty. This has not yet been proved. Yet in your leader ('The hammer blow to our conscience', 21 February), you draw comparisons with Mary Bell, and use the quote: 'Would she know that killing was a crime?' It is as though the fact that the accused are children means that they have diminished legal rights. If we consider adults worthy of a fair trial then two 10-year-olds deserve no less.
Paul Kelly
London SW19
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments