Letter: Hysteria does not remove the need to prove guilt
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LAST WEEK'S insightful leading article on the Bulger case was ruined by a misunderstanding of the valuable concept of 'moral panic'. Far from being a 'balm' for fears about the state of society, the concept helps explain exactly the sorts of things the article was talking about. First, there is some focus for popular concern. This is taken up by politicians and the media. Then a scapegoat is found. Thus Hitler used popular concern about the economic and political decline of Germany to fuel a moral panic, and directed it against the Jews. If widespread concern about the state of British society arising from the Bulger case is successfully diverted by politicians towards the scapegoats of social workers, teachers or the wicked unemployed, then a moral panic will once again have been born.
Neil Mercer
Stony Stratford, Beds
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments