Letter: Human rights to die for?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.YOUR LEADING article ("Mythical, ethical", 8 August) reveals the contradiction at the heart of any claim to conduct foreign policy according to ethical principles. If, as you say, the protection of human rights is an imperative, ie, of the form "Thou shalt not violate any person's human rights", how ought the imperative be upheld?
Would, for instance, "sending in a battalion of foreign legionnaires to sort out the mess" conform to ethical principles? Ought one to kill some human beings in order to enforce others' human rights? Eric Roll, one-time adviser to the British government and academic political economist, gave a timely reminder in 1938. He wrote: "To try to be virtuous in a world inhabited by so many who were without virtue was to court ruin." He was commenting on Machiavelli.
ELLIS THORPE
Inverurie, Aberdeenshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments