Letter: How worker participation would benefit the bosses
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NEAL ASCHERSON ('Made in Europe, wherever the workers are cheap', 7 February) is right to draw attention to the lack of participation by British workers in the daily running of their companies. He could have extended the comment to the public sector, where the same 'them and us' mentality prevails between management and workforce with equally unprofitable results.
There is more to gain from improving employee participation than a mere defence against multinationals, such as Hoover, dividing and ruling the European workforce. The main benefit is improved job satisfaction. While this may not be at the top of every employer's list for the current financial year, they should stop to consider its consequences: less obsession with pay, decreased likelihood of a strike, improved efficiency and productivity, more suggestions from the workforce on how to improve production and so on. Almost as a by-product, the quality of life of everybody is improved.
This is not to say that every work organisation should become, like my own, a workers' cooperative, nor even that all companies should necessarily have workers on the board, but simply to plead for recognition of something that the Japanese have known for many years, namely that letting people make decisions about how they organise their own work, pays dividends.
Andrew Hibbert
Daily Bread Co-operative
Kings Hedges, Cambridge
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments