Letter: How traffic limits children's freedom

Mr John Adams,Mr Mayer Hillman
Friday 17 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: We agree with David Pearce (8 December) that the comparisons made by the road lobby between revenue from motoring taxes and expenditure on roads omit significant social costs. We are, however, doubtful that most of these costs can be assigned a meaningful cash value.

In a recent Policy Studies Institute report (One False Move), we found that one of these costs was a loss of children's freedom; in 1971, 80 per cent of seven- and eight- year-old children got to school unaccompanied by an adult. By 1990 this figure had dropped to 9 per cent, and the reason given by most parents for restricting their children's freedom was fear of traffic. The process of development is one in which children learn to cope independently of adult supervision. As a direct result of increased traffic, children are losing independence at a crucial stage in their development and, as another PSI report shows (Children, Transport and the Quality of Life), this loss is likely to have important adverse consequences for their physical, social and emotional development.

It is also likely to have undesirable effects on the society of which they later become adult members. Beyond this it constitutes a gross infringement of children's rights. Beside these costs, the costs and benefits of motoring that economists can measure pale into insignificance.

Yours sincerely,

JOHN ADAMS

MAYER HILLMAN

University College

London, WC1

13 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in