Letter: How traffic limits children's freedom
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: We agree with David Pearce (8 December) that the comparisons made by the road lobby between revenue from motoring taxes and expenditure on roads omit significant social costs. We are, however, doubtful that most of these costs can be assigned a meaningful cash value.
In a recent Policy Studies Institute report (One False Move), we found that one of these costs was a loss of children's freedom; in 1971, 80 per cent of seven- and eight- year-old children got to school unaccompanied by an adult. By 1990 this figure had dropped to 9 per cent, and the reason given by most parents for restricting their children's freedom was fear of traffic. The process of development is one in which children learn to cope independently of adult supervision. As a direct result of increased traffic, children are losing independence at a crucial stage in their development and, as another PSI report shows (Children, Transport and the Quality of Life), this loss is likely to have important adverse consequences for their physical, social and emotional development.
It is also likely to have undesirable effects on the society of which they later become adult members. Beyond this it constitutes a gross infringement of children's rights. Beside these costs, the costs and benefits of motoring that economists can measure pale into insignificance.
Yours sincerely,
JOHN ADAMS
MAYER HILLMAN
University College
London, WC1
13 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments