Letter: How to make ministers and civil servants accountable
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Andrew Puddephatt
Sir: In the wake of the Scott report, Nicholas Timmins is right to identify the shortcomings of non-statutory codes of conduct governing the conduct of civil servants ("How free can we get with their information?", 19 February). Scott makes it clear that civil servants were party to the deception of Parliament - indeed, to describe answers to Parliamentary Questions as more akin to "an art form than a means of communication", as did one senior civil servant, is an obvious case of deliberate deception by any standards.
The Scott report demonstrates the inadequacy of the doctrine of ministerial accountability to Parliament; in the absence of more formal checks and balances, there is little constraint on power. As well as being a powerful argument for a Freedom of Information Act that places a greater onus on the Government to disclose information it possesses (and which does not allow the withholding of information to avoid political embarrassment), it shows that relying on voluntary codes, on internal systems alone, is not enough. We need a Civil Service Act that places the Civil Service on a statutory basis and makes it accountable to Parliament - and through Parliament to the people of this country. Such an Act could also define more clearly the concept of public interest and protect civil servants' right of conscience, giving them a wholly independent channel of appeal if asked to deceive those to whom they are ultimately accountable.
Yours faithfully,
Andrew Puddephatt
Director
Charter 88
London, EC1
19 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments