Letter: How to make ministers and civil servants accountable
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Tony Dunn
Sir: If, as the Attorney General asserts ("Why I have done nothing wrong", 16 February), "When PII is claimed ... all the documents are shown to the judge [who] must then read them to decide which should be disclosed to the defence", why was it necessary for Michael Heseltine's certificate to be "specially redrafted to emphasise that he was ... leaving to the judge the question as to which document should or should not be released"?
Yours faithfully,
Tony Dunn
Hartford, Cheshire
19 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments