Letter: How to evaluate evidence of ritual abuse

Dr Ashley Conway
Monday 13 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: J. S. La Fontaine's letter (10 June) rightly requests that data rather than rhetoric should be used to challenge her research findings. Her own report states that 'the youngest children (in her study) are to be found in cases of ritual abuse'. Three very competent recent research reports clearly identify young age as a predictor of subsequent amnesia of abusive events.

More surprising may be the additional findings of these studies that amnesia was more likely where there were high levels of violence and trauma. Thus Professor La Fontaine's observation that when children describe satanic rituals 'the stories may change with successive tellings or further elements of horror are added' is completely consistent with what one would expect from genuinely traumatically abused children, yet this observation is not offered in her findings.

A clinician might have considered this as one of the likely mechanisms of distortion, and omissions of this type emphasise the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to this kind of research.

Yours faithfully,

ASHLEY CONWAY

Chartered Psychologist

London, W1

11 June

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in