LETTER : How to approach St Paul's
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Sebastian Loew
Sir: The argument about Paternoster Square ("The Prince of Wales wants to build this next to St Paul's. The City is determined to stop him", 10 February) will not be resolved as long as building designs are discussed in terms of "style".
The proposed scheme is grotesque, but that is almost beside the point. The way to approach the renewal of that part of the City is to start not with the buildings, but with the public realm.
If decision-makers could agree about the kind of public spaces needed around St Paul's, about how these might be used, by whom and for what purpose, and about how these spaces should relate to the surrounding City and to St Paul's, the rest would follow and styles would be irrelevant.
Competitions may be the way forward: first to choose the framework, then to choose the individual buildings.
Yours faithfully,
Sebastian Loew
School of Urban Development
and Policy
South Bank University
London, SW8
12 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments