Letter: How best to protect the rights of the mentally handicapped in care and in the community

Dr Christopher Williams
Sunday 18 September 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Congratulations, once again, to the Independent for giving space to the victimisation of people with learning difficulties.

In 1991, the Independent was the only paper to run the story of the abduction of Jo Ramsden, a young woman with Down's Syndrome. All other papers had ignored this, while giving a similar story about an Oxford graduate, front-page coverage. Ms Ramsden was eventually found dead.

Reluctance to treat crime against people with learning difficulties equitably is not restricted to the press. From carrying out a two-year research project for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, I know that this attitude pervades all aspects of the victimisation of this group of people.

Incidents such as staff locking people in their rooms, individuals being hit, or threats and insults by children are rarely viewed as criminal. The police sometimes do not take reports seriously, and the Crown Prosecution Service has blocked cases concluding that the victims could not be good witnesses; a decision made without meeting the victims. Even in court, negative attitudes prevail. In one case a judge likened an assault on a 45-year-old man to smacking a naughty child.

Let's hope that service providers and the justice system will soon follow the example of the Independent and treat victims with learning difficulties equitably. Then perhaps there will fewer stories to hit the headlines.

Yours faithfully,

CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS

Norah Fry Research Centre

University of Bristol

16 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in