Letter: 'House' should be demolished
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I spent an hour with Rachel Whiteread's House in Bow the other day, and found it every bit as impressive as press coverage had led me to expect. The campaign for its preservation is understandable, but perhaps I may contribute a dissenting note.
Much of its impact, its ability to move and provoke, comes from the very fact of its transitory nature: a heroic idea made real for a brief instant to challenge values and perceptions. Were it to be 'saved' its nature would change completely, both psychologically and physically.
House has probably not been built to last and would need strengthening and continual conservation. It would have to be protected against vandals and graffiti- artists. Considerations of public safety and civic aesthetics would lead to the manicuring of the site, the erection of a substantial surrounding fence, the posting of special bye-laws. Before long, all that would be left would be a bizarre, dated, pointless, rather charming artefact.
Rachel Whiteread's masterpiece should survive in documentation and in the memories of those who saw it in its short physical life - as, for example, is the case with Christo's projects. Wouldn't it be nice were the demolition of House to be used as an excuse for fireworks and a party in the little park for the kids of the neighbourhood; perhaps the generous sponsors of the project might consider signing off their involvement in this
way?
Yours sincerely,
PETER MERRY
Merstham,
Surrey,
15 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments