Letter: 'House' raises questions of art
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Rachel Whiteread's House is one of those rare works of art that unexpectedly touches the nerve of the public. It could be described as a cenotaph commemorating ordinary working-class lives and deaths; and its situation, in a new east London green space, is infinitely more appropriate than, say, the superior neighbourhood of the Tate Gallery.
If House is demolished, not all will be lost. Some enterprising public or private body (my money is on Scotland) will surely offer Ms Whiteread another similar house as the matrix for a permanent memorial. The demolition of the sculpture may be only a local tragedy, felt deeply by people, like myself, who live and work in the district; but it may have wider implications. Councillor Flounders' exultantly philistine bravado is, as your recent leading article ('Putting public gain above private prejudice', 26 November) reminds us, 'illiberal'.
Would it be only a minor local tragedy if the fate of Ms Whiteread's House at the hands of a Liberal Democrat council, two of its fingers raised in the face of public opinion (so soon after those Tower Hamlets Liberal Democrat election leaflets), persuades people like me, whose Liberal Democrat vote in a two-party system is essentially 'a curse on both your houses', to shrug our shoulders and not vote at all in the spirit of 'a curse on all your houses'?
Yours faithfully,
PETER FORSTER
London, N4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments