Letter: Hospital league tables: statistics that confuse efficiency with effectiveness
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You acknowledge your analysis of 'best' and 'worst' hospitals as crude, and then present us with a map founded on that analysis. But unsound statistical practices are unsound, not crude, and they result in mistakes, not 'broad pictures'. For example, in your map based on the 'Star system', you give Salisbury Health Care the black box treatment - lowest rated hospital. In fact, it is one of the best.
Four out of every five hospitals come out worse on day-case surgery indicators; and your example of 'the best' - St George's, Tooting - has more patients waiting longer than 30 minutes for an outpatient appointment, not fewer. Salisbury beats St George's five to one on the first six indicators in your tables. We only lose out on the waiting times, but has anyone thought that that might actually point to good clinical performance?
GPs are referring to Salisbury because they want the service our doctors provide. Quite simply, demand is outstripping supply, despite our surgeons' masterly efforts to speed things up - great day-surgery rates, for example - and the very impressive ratios of operations per surgeon that they achieve. Improved productivity taken on its own won't fix it: we need extended contracts to support the extra work we could do, and that means help from the health authorities that purchase our services.
Yours faithfully,
CHRISTOPHER MOULD
Chief Executive
ERIC WATERS
Medical Director
Salisbury Health Care
Salisbury, Wiltshire
30 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments