Letter: Hong Kong was no accident
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HOW DID Hong Kong become a British colony? Not 'almost by accident', as Raymond Whitaker claimed (Inside Story, 21 March). The Foreign Secretary, Lord Palmerston, intended, even before the outbreak of hostilities between Britain and China in November 1839, that an attempt should be made to obtain from China the cession of at least one island off the China coast. When a draft convention between Britain and China was agreed in January 1841, Palmerston rejected it because it did not demand enough from China. He complained that Hong Kong was just 'a barren island' and that full British sovereignty over it had not been conceded by China.
It is true that by the time a final settlement was agreed between Britain and China in 1842, the British Government was no longer interested in obtaining the cession of Hong Kong. There had been a change of government and Palmerston was no longer in office. But the cession of Hong Kong had been obtained before the new government had been able to alter the instructions to the British negotiators. Rather than make changes to the agreement, the new government decided to accept the treaty as it stood.
Before Chris Patten's appointment, Britain had often been too accommodating towards the Chinese government. But now there is a complete impasse in Sino- British relations from which neither side can retreat without disastrous loss of face. In 1997 Mr Patten will come home to Britain. It will be those he leaves behind in Hong Kong who will have to face the consequences of his actions.
Stephen G Haw
Kingham, Oxfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments