Letter: Homes inspectors in cleft stick
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Polly Toynbee is right to draw attention to the difficulties facing council inspectors who have to monitor the welfare of the elderly in residential homes and children in private nurseries ("An inspector calls on privatised care", 3 March).
One fundamental cause of the tension between private owners and inspectors is the contradictory stance of the Department of Health. By statute, anyone is entitled to be registered as a proprietor unless it is shown that they or the premises are "unfit". This is usually interpreted by the courts as denoting total incompetence or lack of probity to a high degree.
However, the Secretary of State instructed local authorities in 1990 that one of the main purposes of inspection was to encourage providers to raise standards: "It should be seen as an integral part of the registration process and should be used to ensure high standards of service." Yet when inspection units tried to follow this advice the department issued a circular in 1993 complaining that the guidance had been applied over-strictly "and a number appear to have insisted on even higher standards without justification".
Proprietors and local authorities, let alone consumers, are entitled to have a clear statement from the Department about where the balance lies. At the same time, thought could be given to the anomaly that private homes and nurseries are subject to regulation and standards higher than those required of council-run establishments.
JOHN MITCHELL
Family Law Chambers
Garden Court, Temple
London EC4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments