Letter: Home truths
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Matthew Saunders
Sir: Ruth Winawer (Letters, 21 March) expresses delight at the unexpected refund on the works of alteration carried out at her listed building. However, the operative word is "alteration". If she had repaired her property, completely as found, she would have had to pay VAT without prospect of reimbursement unless conceivably the work was done in the name of a company registered for VAT.
The present dotty VAT regime penalises those who wish to keep their listed property in good repair without change and rewards those who seek to alter it (with consent).
An Englishman's home is his castle; the trouble is that the VAT man also lives in a "castle"; the designer was Kafka.
Yours faithfully,
MATTHEW SAUNDERS
Secretary
Ancient Monuments Society
London, EC4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments