Letter: Home truths

Matthew Saunders
Friday 24 March 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas

Editor

From Mr Matthew Saunders

Sir: Ruth Winawer (Letters, 21 March) expresses delight at the unexpected refund on the works of alteration carried out at her listed building. However, the operative word is "alteration". If she had repaired her property, completely as found, she would have had to pay VAT without prospect of reimbursement unless conceivably the work was done in the name of a company registered for VAT.

The present dotty VAT regime penalises those who wish to keep their listed property in good repair without change and rewards those who seek to alter it (with consent).

An Englishman's home is his castle; the trouble is that the VAT man also lives in a "castle"; the designer was Kafka.

Yours faithfully,

MATTHEW SAUNDERS

Secretary

Ancient Monuments Society

London, EC4

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in