Letter: History no mere island story
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As a history teacher, could I ask Robert Winder ("Let's give Harold one in the eye", 28 August), and anyone else who wants to say what should or should not be taught in our schools, to read the National Curriculum.
Mr Winder is right to say we should not have a narrow British-based curriculum and should study more than Harold, Boudicca and so on. We already do.
Mr Winder wants Stalin, Hitler, the Holocaust, feminism, the First World War and the rise of sport and television covered; they are taught in the 20th Century World course. Stephenson and the Industrial Revolution are covered in the Expansion, Trade and Industry course. The Romans and Greeks are covered in detail as is the slave trade, as well as the "traditional British history" of Churchill, Henry VIII and Harold. History in schools is not "a dogged set of names with made-in-Britain tags".
And cheer up - the pupils do actually enjoy it.
ROB DOUGLAS
Sheffield
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments