Letter: History in need of modernity

Mrs Sarah Tyacke
Saturday 05 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In response to David Starkey's article on moving the Public Record Office to the suburbs ('A home fit to house our nation's history', 28 February), may I make the following points.

Because of the impossibility of extending the Chancery Lane building on its cramped inner-London site, the decision to move part of the office's operations to Kew was taken more than 20 years ago, and since 1977 the Kew building has been the office's headquarters and the repository for the records from the 18th century onwards; already more than two-thirds of our readers consult their original documents at Kew and surveys show that the overwhelming majority of them are happy with the facilities and services we provide here.

Admirable though Pennethorne's building in Chancery Lane is, the science of document storage has progressed over the last 150 years and it is vital that the records of our nation's memory be housed in the most up-to-date conditions possible. The high-quality new building at Kew which is currently under construction will enable medieval and early modern records to benefit from these advances in the way the more modern ones already do.

Leaving a building which has been our home for so long is a matter of great sadness, and we, like Dr Starkey, regard its future as important. No final decision has yet been taken, but we are actively seeking a records-related solution which will ensure an appropriate use for it.

Yours faithfully,

SARAH TYACKE

Keeper of Public Records

Public Record Office

Kew,

Surrey

1 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in