Letter: History backs women riders
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Steve Boggan's report ("Riding roughshod over tradition", 7 December) on Hawick's Common Riding notes that women were allowed to ride until 1932.
If the Common-Riding Committee of Hawick think that they are preserving an all-male tradition, history tells us otherwise. Women were visible in these ceremonial ridings from earlier times. Women who were landowners in their own right or the widows of propertied men could participate in the annual marking of the town, village or parish boundaries.
It did not matter whether this was a town in the Scottish Borders or a parish in the City of London - boundaries had to be protected against interlopers.
In 1602 the "riding of the commonty of Innerwick" in East Lothian was led by no less a person than Dame Christian Douglas (Lady Home).
Dr MAUREEN M MEIKLE.
Senior Lecturer in History,
University of Sunderland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments